A surprise move on Sweden’s behalf, particularly in that Sweden also tends to stay Militarily Neutral with other conflicts, and the fact that it does not have NATO Membership, nor does Finland.
Sweden also has not been militarily as relevant as it was back in the 1600’s, but it is very interesting to see this response from them.
Sweden, however, absolutely has a vested interest in the region in their latest move, considering its geographical position towards Russia, and it also has a historical relationship of influence with the Baltic countries, so indeed any effort should be made to thwart Russian takeovers of either Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The only problem, is that all 3 Baltic States are backed by NATO and operate on behalf of NATO in the conflict. So they are pretty much operating in Auto-Pilot, even though removed from Auto-Pilot mode (i.e. No NATO) they would still have the true vested interest to monitor and thwart any Russian escalation beyond established border territory that would be deemed as aggression from Russia.
We do approve this latest move on Sweden’s behalf, however the risks remain high that Sweden and Finland could become sandwiched in the NATO / CSTO standoff in which it could escalate Membership towards the NATO position rather than fighting independently, should an outbreak of war occur.
Sweden should not obtain NATO Membership, no matter how dire, tempting or otherwise the conflict will likely become, and it will only make sense that the USA will try to use bribery towards Sweden in an effort to try to capitalize on this independent move.
Membership in NATO would diffuse all defense efforts from Sweden or any other country to ruins, for the fact that NATO serves other objectives.
But we welcome this move on Sweden’s behalf because of the fact that there is a grave potential of Russian Troops that could perform new activities towards expansionism past the Belarus / Ukraine Frontiers.
As I’ve said, monitoring the situation is crucial, because Russia has its own interests.
For one it has National Interests, but the CSTO vs NATO alliances are Supra-National and have whole other objectives, and as I’ve stated, both alliances have Zionist backing.
Declaration of war against Russia should not occur as long as they do not permeate the Belarus / Ukrainian territory, and for many reasons even aside the EU (even if it did not exist), these countries are less in relation and not much that would be able to be done in the best circumstances considering the geography.
But Russia should not be permitted to expand upon this region, and I do praise the Swedish efforts. The Baltic States, are unfortunately, NATO Members, even at the behest of them no longer being a direct part of Russia, which they should never have been in the first place.
But we do know that Putin wants to reclaim all former Soviet Territories under his style of Regime.
Many other powers including Canada is also presenting itself in the conflict, but unfortunately as a result of “NATO”.
It appears that the USA/NATO ability to ignite WW3 has been a slow process compared to what they have been attempting in the last few years in the Caucasus region with Armenia (with a color revolution in Armenia), and installing a puppet dictator as they have meddled their way into that sphere to further push American influence in the region, rather than Russia’s influence, when Russia has a protection influence over that country and other regional countries.
Russia and some of these regional countries are part of the CSTO alliance, which boasts its own protection sphere against NATO hegemonic powers.
The problem however, is that these events, irrespective of how they play out, are all destined to lead to WWIII, which is nearly inevitable in that it will occur one way or another.
In fact, when the situations escalated in the Caucasus in the last year or so when Armenia began aggression and genocidal actions against the Azerbaijanis, it was creating such an uproar in the region between different Nations and tribal fractions that countries like India, Pakistan and other countries were flirting with ideas of defending Armenia’s position on that battlefront, a very small-scale war and if formations manifested between handfuls of powers which would be riled up enough, that conflict last year could have very well escalated into WWIII. Israel dogging America along had the hand in this conflict, and they played it in a way because of very twisted arrangements of alliances and conditions in the region, just aching to get WWIII going. But the sentiment did not last.
Armenia tried to play the conflict off under their religious (Christian) victim veneer, as they historically do to justify their aggression against the Islamic world.
Nevertheless, while we go to wars and we do not approve of Christianity or Islam for Europe and any of our people, we do not go to the war against Nations based on their religion unless they try to export it. The Zionists are the ones with strategic interests in that.
It’s not necessarily justifiable to go to a war against one country over another simply because of their religion, the Government or People, rather, have to present a direct threat.
For the first time in Armenia’s legacy of playing off this aggression, European Powers and People largely remained indifferent, sympathies and pleas from Armenia’s people and government fell on deaf ears, compared to the general course of procedures, even in a time when more European countries have sided with Armenia’s grievances over the so-called “Genocide” of 1915, but yet even this wasn’t enough to muster sympathy from the May 2021 attacks Armenia had carried out an Islamic country like Azerbaijan, because it was obvious that the attack was one of aggression, and Armenia was caught red-handed not obeying cease-fires from the other side, and purposely was working to destroy all kinds of monuments, artifacts and directly was trying to commit a genocide against the Azeri people, rather than only targeting military barracks or stations.
It came very evident to the International Community at large, that Armenia was attempting to steal land territory that they are not entitled to, and that even the UN recognized that the disputed Karabagh territory is rightfully Azerbaijan territory. Alas, Armenia was caught with its pants down in this conflict, but the conflict and tensions were being used by US/Israel to bring about a greater regional takeover, however it did not form the momentum they had hoped for.
So the USA, as usual, decided to switch tactics back to Ukraine meddling as a way to target Russia, continuing from conflicts that last had taken place there at the 2013 / 2014 Maidan revolution.
At other times, the USA picks on Iran, Syria and North Korea when it’s bored and wants to create problems in the world, but notice how we hear very little about that now!?
In previous times, the USA also had meddling affairs in another country in the Caucasus Region [Georgia] and ironically it is because of Russia’s actions due to the power balance that we also have not yet entered World War III, but this is more due to circumstantial reasons and vested interests / power play, granted Russia, like China, like to do what they do by avoiding war, unlike the Americans and other countries aligned with Zionists.
The Media shifts talks around and switch up the enemy they currently want to get people riled up over, to distract people but also to attempt new access points of targeting the East, alternating with reports of new conflicts and threats, even perceived ones.
The problem is that NATO always has its own interests which have nothing to do with Nations and Peoples, so even if for example, it dislikes policies of a country like Iran or North Korea, it does so on the basis of economic hegemony and other strategic interests.
We have no particular interest with Iran or North Korea that are economic in scope or for any other strategies behind dismantling any spy networks they operate outside of their borders and any expansion attempts.
Iranian Spies are a big problem, yet the worst part is that the USA and UK routinely had hired them! And then it demands to go to war against them.
How brilliant is that, to army and equip your enemy for a fight you will intend to eventually have against him!? That is exactly what the English and Americans do, but they used these people, whether Iranians, Saudis and others for other Imperial interests beyond the imagination or ambitions of even most mighty Imperial Powers!
It just proves all the more why this Imperial Model is failed, that the English and Americans use.
So we must be on the lookout for what will come of this situation with new threats the USA is making, and at the same time what levels of amassing troops that the Russians are doing, as they have been sending their artillery equipment in through Belarus.
It is important that for whatever is left among European Leadership, and I do not think highly of any of their leaders because the governments are compromised, performing the right decisions are important.
The fact that Europe is increasingly becoming torn between NATO and Russia’s sphere of influence with CSTO is showing the changing power balance that is taking place, and exactly why Europe DOES need a Hegemonic power on its own continental region to be able to take care of matters which threaten European world affairs.
However, Europeans and their leaders are not wrong in their growing frustrations with US/NATO because over the years, they have reneged on many promises and over protection deals for Europe, and also is the fact that under Trump’s leadership, he vastly imposed higher costs for NATO Allies to pay for protection guarantees as being a NATO Member.
Even in the last several years, the mood has turned sour, rightfully so, for many European Countries like Germany, Italy, France and others towards these policies and the dwindling promises by NATO, nevermind the fact that NATO should not even exist, and that Europe would be a lot better off without NATO.
Germany may be at the seat of the EU and have the biggest economy in Europe, but it’s still a shell of its former self on many levels and does not have National Sovereignty. It is an occupied country and it can be quick for many people to forget that. America has its way over Germany, illegally.
By 2025, most countries in Europe and all the Anglo-Saxon countries including America are scheduled for major depopulation according to official projections, and so between people getting their poison shots, economic decline, civil unrest and the large potential outbreak of a new world war, we see things marching very close in that direction.
Any attempt by Russia to mobilize or overstep the Belarus-Ukrainian border should be viewed as an Act of Aggression, and absolutely justifiable to declare war against Russia. Aside from the fact of what will come out of it.
It is just a tragedy because of the fact that NATO stands in the way of it being a clean and objective war. Please understand what I mean by “clean” in relative usage.
Even war plans these days operate in Auto-Pilot, in a world where nearly every government on earth is compromised and infiltrated in one form or another.